Obama has said Ayatollah Khamenei has issued a fatwa against the development of nuclear weapons. It is based on this fatwa that Obama believes the Iranians will not use their nuclear program to develop nuclear weapons. And even if the fatwa doesn't exist, he believes the U.S. can convince them over the next ten years not to develop weapons.
The problem with this is that Iran was built on a charter that calls for the destruction of Israel. Another problem is that no one can find any evidence that such a fatwa exists. A fatwa is a legal pronouncement issued by an expert in religious law, and it's usually a pronouncement against the infidels or the enemy, not against a weapon.
Iranian leaders are proud of their fatwas, and therefore list them publicly on their websites. The Iranian website Tasnimnews published 493 fatwas from Khamenei dating back to 2004, and not one of them says anything about nuclear weapons. According to the Washington Post, the evidence that such a fatwa exists is "quite fuzzy."
There was actually a scientist who called into one of the radio shows I was listening to on the way home from work one day, and he said that if Iran bombs Israel, the reaction would also destroy Iran. So the question posed was: why would Iran use a bomb to destroy the infidels in Israel if it would result in their own destruction?
The consensus was that Muslims don't value life the way Christians do. Or at least Radical Muslims don't value life. So if they destroyed themselves in the process they'd go down in history as heros of the cause.
Anyway, along with the anti-nuclear weapon fatwa, Iranian President Rouhani said he won't use whatever remnants of the nuclear program are left in ten years to create nuclear weapons. Being that the Iranians have shown their radical Muslim tendencies many times over the past several years, it's amazing to me that we are even talking to them.
Oh, and one more thing. If there really is a fatwa that says the Iranians will not use their nuclear program to develop weapons, then why are we talking to them. If they have sworn off nuclear weapons, why to we need to broker a deal?
It seems that a more rational approach would be for Obama and Kerry to help the "hardliners" in Iran who oppose the Iranian Regime and want to oust it in favor of a democratic government. Instead, he goes to Iran, tries to broker a bad deal with them, while saying to their people:
Hello. To everyone celebrating Nowruz -- across the United States and in countries around the world -- Nowruz Mubarak. This year we had the best opportunity in decades to pursue a different future between our countries. Just over a year ago we reached an initial understanding regarding Iran's nuclear program. I believe that our countries should be able to resolve this issue peacefully with diplomacy. Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, has issued a fatwa against the development of nuclear weapons, and President Rouhani has said that Iran would never develop a nuclear weapon.To make sense of this, we must understand that the entire premise of fascism is that a worldwide utopia can be created through negotiations. They actually believe this idealist utopia will some day be a reality. They believe those who oppose them are idiots. Yet the idiots usually tend to be the realists.
Hitler said he was going to kill all the Jews and Chamberlain didn't take him seriously. Iranian leaders have said many times over that they want nuclear weapons and they will stop at nothing until Israel is destroyed.
Yet now it's Obama who isn't taking the fascist seriously.
Further reading:
No comments:
Post a Comment