Of course then you have your typical liberals watching the movie claiming it to be not diversified enough. They claim it was an all white film.
So, what are we supposed to do: change history? I mean, here you have this 97 year old man who has lived with this battle for most of his life, and these naive feminists purport to be the experts on the war.
I'm sorry to say this, but history was not diversified. If you want the future to be more diversified, fine. But the past is what the past is.
If there were women who played key roles in Dunkirk, fine! Tell that story in another movie if you want. But for crying out loud, if there were all white men in the war, it wouldn't be fair to history to have an equal number of men as women as blacks as Hispanics as Muslims in that war.
If they were there, and they played key roles, then show them. But, for the sake of our real history, Dunkirk was a war that featured mainly white men. That's just the way it was back then. To change that history would be to fail our children.
- Fox News: 97-year-old Dunkirk veteran: 'it was just like I was there again.
- The Rightly Report: Feminist Flunks 'Dunkirk" as 'Mediocre' Men Only Film